Defect Not Reproducible In Manual But In Automation Testing
A defect that is not reproducible in manual testing but can be identified through automation testing
Defect Not Reproducible In Manual But In Automation Testing
Defects that are not reproducible through manual testing but can be identified in automation testing are invaluable for software quality assurance because they often stem from intricate scenarios that manual testers may overlook. Automated testing can simulate numerous operations rapidly and under varying conditions, allowing for the detection of issues such as race conditions, memory leaks, or timing discrepancies that might only surface under specific circumstances. This capability enhances the reliability of the software by ensuring that even subtle, hard-to-detect defects are addressed, leading to a more robust and stable application. As a result, incorporating automated testing into the development process not only improves the efficiency of the testing phase but also significantly elevates the overall quality of the final product.
To Download Our Brochure: https://www.justacademy.co/download-brochure-for-free
Message us for more information: +91 9987184296
Defects that are not reproducible through manual testing but can be identified in automation testing are invaluable for software quality assurance because they often stem from intricate scenarios that manual testers may overlook. Automated testing can simulate numerous operations rapidly and under varying conditions, allowing for the detection of issues such as race conditions, memory leaks, or timing discrepancies that might only surface under specific circumstances. This capability enhances the reliability of the software by ensuring that even subtle, hard to detect defects are addressed, leading to a more robust and stable application. As a result, incorporating automated testing into the development process not only improves the efficiency of the testing phase but also significantly elevates the overall quality of the final product.
Course Overview
The “Defect Not Reproducible in Manual but in Automation Testing” course provides an in-depth exploration of the intricacies of software testing, focusing on how automated testing can unearth defects that manual testing may miss. Participants will learn to identify, document, and analyze non-reproducible defects, gaining hands-on experience with various automation tools and techniques. The course covers real-time case studies, enabling learners to understand not only the causes of these elusive defects but also effective strategies to address them. By the end of the course, participants will be equipped with the knowledge and skills necessary to enhance software quality assurance efforts, ultimately leading to more robust and reliable software products.
Course Description
The “Defect Not Reproducible in Manual but in Automation Testing” course offers an in-depth examination of why certain software defects may go unnoticed in manual testing but can be identified through automated testing methods. Participants will explore the underlying causes of these elusive defects, learn how to effectively document and analyze them, and gain hands-on experience with popular automation tools and frameworks. The course emphasizes practical, real-time project work, allowing learners to apply their knowledge and develop strategies for improving software quality assurance processes. By the end of this course, participants will possess the skills and confidence to detect and address defects more effectively, ensuring higher reliability and performance in software applications.
Key Features
1 - Comprehensive Tool Coverage: Provides hands-on training with a range of industry-standard testing tools, including Selenium, JIRA, LoadRunner, and TestRail.
2) Practical Exercises: Features real-world exercises and case studies to apply tools in various testing scenarios.
3) Interactive Learning: Includes interactive sessions with industry experts for personalized feedback and guidance.
4) Detailed Tutorials: Offers extensive tutorials and documentation on tool functionalities and best practices.
5) Advanced Techniques: Covers both fundamental and advanced techniques for using testing tools effectively.
6) Data Visualization: Integrates tools for visualizing test metrics and results, enhancing data interpretation and decision-making.
7) Tool Integration: Teaches how to integrate testing tools into the software development lifecycle for streamlined workflows.
8) Project-Based Learning: Focuses on project-based learning to build practical skills and create a portfolio of completed tasks.
9) Career Support: Provides resources and support for applying learned skills to real-world job scenarios, including resume building and interview preparation.
10) Up-to-Date Content: Ensures that course materials reflect the latest industry standards and tool updates.
Benefits of taking our course
Functional Tools
1 - Selenium
Selenium is a widely used automation tool for web applications that allows testers to write test scripts in various programming languages such as Java, Python, and C#. Its flexibility enables testers to create complex user interactions and validate application behavior, which is particularly useful when dealing with defects that may not be easily reproducible in manual testing. Selenium’s ability to integrate with other tools enhances its functionality, and it can seamlessly fit into continuous integration pipelines, ensuring that defects are identified and managed early in the development process.
2) Appium
Appium is an open source mobile application testing tool that supports both Android and iOS platforms. It allows testers to automate native, hybrid, and mobile web applications using a single API. This is particularly advantageous for situations where defects appear in automated tests but not in manual tests, as Appium provides a framework for handling various mobile testing scenarios. Its cross platform capabilities enable the execution of tests on multiple devices, fostering a comprehensive testing approach that can reveal inconsistencies and bugs that may otherwise go unnoticed.
3) TestNG
TestNG is a testing framework inspired by JUnit and NUnit, which introduces several advanced features for test configuration and execution. This tool allows testers to define test cases, set dependencies, and manage test execution order effectively, which is crucial when identifying intermittent defects. TestNG also provides detailed reporting features, helping testers analyze automated tests' results and defects that appear solely in automated environments, making it easier to pinpoint issues that are not attainable through manual testing.
4) JIRA
JIRA is a project management tool commonly used in Agile environments to track issues and manage workflows. It provides an effective way to log defects that are found during automated testing. By integrating automated testing tools with JIRA, teams can ensure that any defect identified in automation is documented, prioritized, and tracked throughout its lifecycle. This holistic approach helps in understanding the context of defects that are hard to reproduce in manual tests, streamlining communication within teams and enhancing overall project quality.
5) Cypress
Cypress is an emerging testing tool designed for modern web applications that offers capabilities like real time reloads and automatic waiting. The ease of setting up Cypress makes it ideal for developers who want to test their code continuously. It excels at reproducing complex scenarios that might not be evident through manual testing, especially when it comes to asynchronous operations within applications. Cypress’s ability to provide detailed error messages and debugging information significantly aids testers in diagnosing issues that stem from discrepancies between manual and automated behaviors.
6) Postman
Postman is primarily an API testing tool, which allows teams to automate the testing of RESTful APIs with ease. Understanding defects that occur specifically in an automated testing environment often relies on thorough API validation. By using Postman, testers can create collections of requests that can be executed automatically to verify the interaction between the frontend and backend of applications. Any discrepancies that only appear in automated tests can thus be identified, ensuring that the entire application ecosystem functions as expected.
Here are additional points and insights on the tools mentioned earlier, expanding on their features, benefits, and applications in the context of identifying defects in automated testing:
Selenium
Cross Browser Testing: Selenium supports multiple browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and Safari. This capability allows testers to ensure consistent functionality across different web environments, helping to catch browser specific defects.
Grid Support: Selenium Grid enables parallel test execution on different machines, reducing testing time and facilitating quicker feedback loops. This feature is particularly valuable in teams that need to deliver high quality releases rapidly.
Rich Ecosystem: Selenium has a vast ecosystem of plugins and integrations, enabling testers to extend functionality and connect with various CI/CD tools, such as Jenkins and CircleCI, to automate defect detection further.
Appium
Language Flexibility: Appium allows testers to write tests in multiple languages such as Ruby, Java, and JavaScript. This flexibility empowers development teams to use their preferred languages and frameworks, facilitating collaboration and increasing the rate of defect identification.
Support for Real Devices and Emulators: Appium can run tests on real devices as well as emulators/simulators, ensuring a thorough validation of the application's functionality under various real world scenarios and catching defects that may occur only on specific devices.
Handling Gesture and Touch Actions: Appium provides robust capabilities for automating touch interactions, which are crucial for mobile applications. This helps catch defects related to touch events that might not be evident during manual testing.
TestNG
Data Parameterization: TestNG supports data driven testing using parameterization, which allows testers to run the same test multiple times with different inputs. This feature is essential for identifying edge cases and defects that are input specific.
Annotations and Configuration: TestNG's annotations allow easy configuration and prioritization of tests, making it simple to run specific groups of tests to isolate scenarios that may introduce defects during automated testing.
Integration with Reporting Tools: TestNG can integrate with reporting tools like Extent Reports to provide enhanced visualization of test results. This assists teams in quickly identifying and addressing defects, especially in a continuous testing environment.
JIRA
Advanced Workflow Management: JIRA allows teams to customize their workflow for defect prioritization and resolution. This adaptability helps teams manage challenging defects more effectively, ensuring that those that are only exposed in automated tests receive adequate attention.
Real time Collaboration: JIRA facilitates collaboration among cross functional teams, enhancing communication around defects. Comments, attachments, and links to automated test results can be included in defect logs, providing context that helps in diagnosis and resolution.
Integration with Automation Tools: Many automation tools can integrate directly with JIRA, automatically creating and updating defects based on automated test outcomes, ensuring that no defects are overlooked in the development cycle.
Cypress
Time Travel: Cypress provides a feature called “time travel,” allowing testers to visualize exactly what happened at each step in the test case. This visualization aids in debugging tricky automated tests and understanding defects that may not show up in manual exploration.
Built in Waiting: Unlike traditional Selenium tests, Cypress automatically waits for commands to complete and DOM elements to appear, minimizing flaky tests. This reliability is crucial for accurately capturing conditions that lead to defects.
Video Recording and Screenshots: Cypress automatically records video of the test execution and captures screenshots on failure. This helps in diagnosing issues that may not manifest during manual testing, providing visual evidence of what went wrong.
Postman
Mock Servers: Postman allows users to create mock servers, which can simulate API responses. This capability can help identify defects that might occur if the API behaves differently in real time versus expected responses.
Automated API Testing: With Postman’s built in automation features, teams can schedule tests to run at regular intervals, ensuring that any defect introduced in the API over time is detected early.
Collaboration and Version Control: Postman provides a robust platform for team collaboration, with the ability to share collections of tests and API documentation easily. This transparency allows teams to quickly identify and address defects as they arise.
Conclusion
Implementing these tools effectively can significantly enhance defect detection during automated testing. By leveraging their unique features, teams can ensure a more reliable and comprehensive testing process, ultimately leading to higher software quality and a smoother user experience. JustAcademy offers certifications on these tools, ensuring that professionals are equipped with the knowledge and skills necessary to excel in modern software testing environments.
Browse our course links : https://www.justacademy.co/all-courses
To Join our FREE DEMO Session:
This information is sourced from JustAcademy
Contact Info:
Roshan Chaturvedi
Message us on Whatsapp: +91 9987184296
Email id: info@justacademy.co
